Legal Opinion
Union Oil Co. v. Minier
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1970No. Nos. 25045-25048PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge:
The efforts of David T. Minier, District Attorney of Santa Barbara County (appellant here) to' stop the development of the outer Continental Shelf in the *410Santa Barbara channel and the production of oil by threatened use of the California criminal process, were enjoined by the District Court. This appeal is taken from orders refusing to vacate preliminary injunctions. We affirm.
The Outer Continental Shelf consists of the lands described in 43 U.S.C.A. § 1331(a). The mineral resources on and under the shelf, together with the right to exploit them are owned by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mayo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pacific Coast Dairy, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. City of ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Grace Geothermal Corp. v. Northern California Power AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Union Oil Company of California, a Corporation, and Fred L. Hartley v. David D. Minier, Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation, and Frank Davis v. David D. Minier, Texaco, Inc., a Corporation, and Wallace A. Avery v. David D. Minier, Crandall D. Jones and Humble Oil Refining Company, a Corporation v. David D. MinierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970