Legal Opinion

Grace Geothermal Corp. v. Northern California Power Agency

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 14, 1985No. C-84-6741 JPVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

VUKASIN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Grace Geothermal Corporation [“Grace”] instituted the above-referenced action against defendants Northern California Power Agency [“NCPA”]; the Cities of Alameda, Biggs, Gridley, Healdsburg, Lodi, Lompoc, Palo Alto, Redding, Roseville, Santa Clara, and Ukiah; the Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative; and Robert Grimshaw. At the time of filing the complaint on October 11,1984, plaintiff further filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction.

Oral…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kenneth W. Benda v. Grand Lodge Of The International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Jack R. Salley, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Daughter, Danielle Salley, Cross-Appellants. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. The Sierra Club v. Stanley K. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Beltran v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Israni v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Israni v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API