Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Olson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1941No. 28214PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Independent actions in mandamus were brought in the superior court by plaintiffs so that they might be allowed to fill civil service positions, known as “account clerks,” and to recover the difference in salary between that position and the next lower position of “intermediate clerk.” The cases were tried together, and have been consolidated for purposes of appeal. The trial court denied the petitions and dismissed the actions. Plaintiffs appealed.

They assign error as follows: In refusing to enforce the resolution of the civil service commission; in holding that the duties of “account clerk”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Allard v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Larson v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Warmus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. State v. Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Adams v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Tuscaloosa v. MarcumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Keiffer v. City of Seattle Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API