Legal Opinion

United States v. One Black Horse

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 26, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On Information for Forfeiture.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

The attorney of the United States for this district has filed an information against certain property, to wit, one black horse, one wagon, and -one set of single harness, seized by the Treasury Department as forfeited to the United States for having been used for the conveyance and transportation of cer*771tain Sumatra leaf tobacco, brought into the United States without having paid the duty to which it was subject. The claimant, the Hudson Steam Laundry Company, denies that the property has been forfeited as set out and claimed in the information.

The case was tried before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. One Black HorseDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1904
  3. United States v. Two Bay MulesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  2. United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
  3. United States v. One Lincoln Touring CarDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1925
  4. United States v. Two Gallons of WhiskyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1914
  5. United States v. One Paige AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API