Legal Opinion
Cinelli v. Security Pacific Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1995No. 93-17318PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
In a case arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), we are called upon to determine whether the termination of an insurance policy was consistent with the terms of the plan documents. In so doing we must consider what constitutes the plan documents and whether because of an ambiguity or mistake, those documents should be reformed.
Alfred Cinelli appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Security Pacific Corporation Supplemental Group Life Insurance Plan (“the Supplemental Plan”), Security Pacific Corporation (“Security…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Robert L. Musto v. American General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Virginia Armistead, Cross-Appellants v. Vernitron Corporation Aie--Division of Vernitron Group Insurance Plan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Health Cost Controls v. Ralph Isbell, Father and Next Friend of Tammy IsbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Neil Winterrowd v. American General Annuity Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Aramony v. United Way of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Kiefer v. Ceridian Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- David Wit v. United Behavioral HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.