Legal Opinion

Poston v. Ebert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1922No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff by deed became the owner of 8 lots in Detroit. The deed was subject to “a real estate mortgage in the sum of $200 on each lot or parcel of land aforesaid which the second party hereby assumes and agrees to pay.” The mortgagees were Andrew J. Keary and Ella R. Keary, defendants. The mortgage contained a power of sale. Under the provisions of chapter 249, 3 Comp. Laws 1915, relating to foreclosure of mortgages by advertisement, the premises were sold February 5,1918, to the mortgagees. The sheriff made and executed a deed and delivered it to the register of deeds pursuant to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Erickson v. . MacYNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Hoffman v. Charlestown Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Morse v. StoberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ebert v. PostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Blazejowski v. StadnickiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Walgreen Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API