Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Trademark Construction, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2003No. S-10609PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Electric Company appeals the superior court’s dismissal of its contract action against Trademark Construction, contending that the court made insufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law when it dismissed the case under Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prove damages with sufficient certainty. Alaska Electric also contends that the trial court made various errors in its application of Civil Rule 41(b). Because the superior court’s findings of fact are sufficient to indicate the legal and factual bases for its ruling,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel & Marine Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. David Irish, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Clifford L. Irish, and Clifford L. Irish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Azimi v. JohnsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Crowley v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Lentine v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. 3-D & Co. v. Tew's Excavating, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Foster v. Professional Guardian Services Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API