Banner Tobacco Co. v. Jenison
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This is an action of assumpsit originating in justice’s court, appealed to and tried in the circuit court, where the plaintiff had judgment. The defendants bring it here by writ of error.
The following facts will present tbe general features of the case. On June 26, 1875, the defendants were in business together as millers at Jenisonville, near Grand Rapids, under the partnership name of L. & L. Jenison. One B. E. Emery was at the same time in business selling groceries, flour and feed at Whitehall, and was indebted to defendants in upwards' of a thousand dollars. He was indebted to others…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Kerr v. LunsfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
- Leo Austrian & Co. v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Carpenter v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- May v. GouldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Fishbaugh v. SpunaugleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.