May v. Goulding
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
This case involves the common-law rule that a parent may be found guilty of actionable-negligence for having intrusted — or having made-accessible — a firearm or other deadly weapon to his-mentally deficient child. Restatement’s comment, on clause (c) of section-877 (4 Restatement of Torts, pp 442-444), portrays the general rule:
“d. A person who has voluntarily taken charge of an insane or otherwise dangerous person, a prison guard or officer having custody of or a duty to control a criminal or other person who he has reason to know will cause harm if he escapes, a parent having a minor child…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- St. George v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Excelsior Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Elbert v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Buczkowski v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Phillips v. Mirac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Langen v. RushtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- American States Insurance v. AlbinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.