Legal Opinion

Dutton v. Peacock

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 23, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Appellants Oletta Dutton, Sarah Meece and LaDonna Woodward sustained injuries when the automobile in which they were riding on a street in Lexington was struck from behind by the automobile of the ap-pellee Melvin Peacock. In the appellants’ suit for damages against Peacock the jury gave Oletta $1,849.30, LaDonna $864.06 and Sarah $135.00. Judgment was entered accordingly. This appeal indicates the appellants’ dissatisfaction with the amounts of their recoveries.

The appellants’ main contention is that the damages awarded them were gross- and inadequate and therefore they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  2. East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corp. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  3. Bourland v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  4. Wooten v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mandarelli v. McGovernSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API