Legal Opinion
Toledo, P. & W. R. R. v. Stover
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided May 19, 1945No. Civil Action P-380PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
The plaintiff is the owner of a railroad together with right of way, buildings, equipment, etc., necessary to the operation thereof. During the years 1940 and 1941 plaintiff was engaged in a labor dispute with certain of its employees, and refused to submit this dispute to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., although it had sought to settle the dispute by negotiation and mediation. On December 28, 1941, a strike was called by plaintiff’s employees. Plaintiff thereupon filed its suit in this court for the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hahn v. Alaska Title Guaranty CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Yoshida International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Brownell v. Schering CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
- Wittstein v. American Federation of MusiciansDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Aris Gloves, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.