United Medical Corp. of Tennessee v. Hohenwald Bank & Trust Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, Chief Justice.
The issue in this case is the fee due an attorney for services rendered in the collection of two promissory notes. The deed of trust securing the payment of the two notes provides that, in event of default, the debtor would be liable for:
All costs of collecting, including an amount as attorneys’ fees not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the principal and interest to be collected.
Giving due notice to the appropriate factors to be used as guides in fixing a reasonable attorney’s fee, see Disciplinary Rule 2-106 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, the chancellor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northcross v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Connors v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Carmack v. Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Fort Smith & Western Railroad v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Hail v. Nashville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Killingsworth v. Ted Russell Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Wilson Management Co. v. Star Distributors Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Wallace v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Ferguson Harbour Inc. v. Flash Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.