Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Kansas Department of Health & Environment

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 2, 2013No. 108,630PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atcheson, J.:

This case requires the court to decide a narrow, if seldom litigated, question: If a state fails to properly apply its own procedures for adopting administrative regulations to an agency policy, does that failure create a federal constitutional due process violation in favor of persons affected by the policy? The Sedgwick County District Court ruled that Plaintiff Nicholas Taylor suffered a constitutional injury when Defendant Kansas Department of Health and Environment did not treat a policy applicable to him as part of the State’s Medicaid program as a formal administrative…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Interests A.A.-F.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Chubb v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  4. In the Interest of X.D.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. Board of Riley County Comm'rs v. Kansas Historical SocietyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API