In the Interest of X.D.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
Corey D. (Father) appeals the district court’s termination of his parental rights to five children. He argues that the district court violated his due-process rights when it found that the State had presented a sufficient evidentiary basis for presuming him an unfit parent without first • hearing the evidence Father wanted to present on the unfitness presumption.
We agree with Father that the district court’s procedure violated his due-process rights. A fundamental part of due process is the opportunity to be heard in a meaningful way. The presumption of unfitness that can be applied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Smith v. Yell Bell Taxi, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re A.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- In re Interest of T.E.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- In re K.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020