Shankle v. . Ingram
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action to recover damages for the breach of covenants in a deed. Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that in 1888 the defendants conveyed to him a tract of land in Richmond County containing 245 acres, being the lot set apart to Nannie Leak in the division of a larger tract. That the deed contained covenants of warranty and seizin in the usual form, and that at the time of the execution of the deed the defendants were not the owners of the entire premises, as they had in 1887 conveyed 41.8 acres of the land to one Jesse Reynolds, and that the plaintiff has not been permitted nor has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Fields v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- McKee, Sheriff v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Sloan v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Price v. . DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Cover v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Campbell v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Crowell v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Riddle v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.