Legal Opinion
Shoenfelt v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 1995No. 17011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reece, Judge.
Appellant, James Shoenfelt, appeals the trial court’s affirmance of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission’s (“OCRC”) determination that he engaged in racial discrimination and its award of attorney fees as a consequence of his discriminatory acts. We affirm.
I
In October 1989 Joann Wahab was seeking a new apartment. She read a newspaper advertisement listing an available rental in the Wooster-Hawkins area of Akron, Ohio. Wahab responded to the advertisement by phone and talked to James Shoenfelt, the owner and landlord of the property. Shoenfelt indicated that the property was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- John W. Marr and Lucille Marr v. Douglas RifeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Board of Education v. Fulton County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Bottoms Up, Inc. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Darby v. Heather Ridge & Dart Properties, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Preferred Properties, Inc. v. Indian River Estates, Inc. Duane J. TillimonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Proctor v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2006