Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Chicago v. Reno County Bank

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 11, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMoCeary, C. J.

This cause was tried before the court at the November term, 1879, and resulted in a judgment for the defendant. At the request of Judge Foster, before whom it was tried, the motion for a new trial has been argued before the full bench. The facts are as follows:

1. The plaintiff, which is a bank in Chicago, in July, 1878, became the owner, by assignment to it, of two negotiable bank checks drawn on the defendant, which is a bank at Hutchinson, Kansas.

2. Plaintiff transmitted said checks to W. Iletherington & Co., of Atchison, Kansas, indorsing each of them as follows:

“Pay to the order of W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  2. Hoover v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Thomas Wilson & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Hall v. MarstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
  5. Taylor v. SavageSupreme Court of the United States · 1843

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ayres v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Sumitomo Bank of Hawaii, Ltd. v. Hawaii Nosan Shokwai, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API