Legal Opinion

M.G. Oil Co. v. City of Rapid City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2011No. 25613PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] M.G. Oil Company (M.G. Oil) applied to the City of Rapid City (City) for a conditional use permit to operate a video lottery casino. The Rapid City Common Council (City Council) denied the permit. M.G. Oil next sought a writ of mandamus, seeking an order that the City Council grant M.G. Oil the permit. The circuit court issued the writ, finding that the City Council’s decision to deny the permit was “unreasonable, arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion.” The City appeals.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] M.G. Oil filed a petition for a conditional use 1 permit to operate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Arneson v. ArnesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Therkildsen v. Fisher BeverageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Coyote Flats, L.L.C. v. Sanborn County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eliason v. City of Rapid CityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API