Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Bradley

(after stating the facts as above).

The court charged the jury that although the defendant company may have been-guilty of negligence in respect to the condition of the car door fastening, yet the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by falling of' the door, precluding a recovery in case the plaintiff before the injury timely knew, or might have known by the exercise of ordinary cafe, of the defective fastening of the car door and the danger incident thereto.- The- defendant excepted to the charge, in effect upon the ground that it limited the inquiry to whether as a matter of fact the…