Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Klump

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1938No. 1847PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

Mary Klump, individually and as duly qualified community survivor of the estate of William Klump, deceased, instituted this suit against the defendant W. H. Flowers to recover upon five promissory notes. One of the notes was for $725, and three for $250 each, and one for $320. A plea of limitation was interposed against the $320 note, which was sustained by the court, and no complaint is made against that ruling.

The defendant alleged by special plea that the $725 note, dated January 1, 1936, was without consideration, and further that it was given in renewal of and in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. McAdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Olschewske v. PriesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Dodson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Hagelstein v. BlaschkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Nesbitt v. First Nat. Bank of San AngeloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chajkowski v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API