Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Hutchinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun; Peck, J., presiding. Bill by Mary J. Crosby against Leonard D. Hutchinson-to quiet title. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Robert Brady died seised of 160 acres of land. He left a widow and three children, two of whom quitclaimed to the widow, Mary Brady. The other, Lannes Brady, did not. It has been adjudicated that Mary Brady acquired no more than a life estate by the quitclaim deed from her children. The complainant acquired the title to the shares of the two children mentioned, and it is conceded that she is owner- of an undivided two-thirds interest in fee. She claims to own the fee in the share owned by Lannes Brady also. It rests on the following facts: Clark, Baker & Thompson, copartners, obtained a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Blackwood v. Van VleetMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Rubert v. BraytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blackford v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Moody v. MacomberMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Featherston v. Pontiac TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Tinker v. PiperMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API