Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Hanley v. Hanley

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1943No. L. A. 18316Published

1DissentCurtis, J.

I dissent. The proposition presented for determination is whether, in the light of the peculiar factual situation here involved, the appellant should be relieved by this court from the operation of the statute fixing the time for the taking of an appeal. While it does not appear that the erroneous statement in the notice referable to the filing date of the order approving the executrix’ account was wilfully made for the purpose of misleading appellant, the natural and necessary consequence of the service of such notice upon her counsel was to induce reliance upon its positive statement of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bauer v. GarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Anthony v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Nagelmann v. McIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API