Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 24, 1944No. 492PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The question in this case is whether petitioner, a mutual life insurance company, was entitled to deduct from its gross income for 1933 “excess interest dividends” paid within that year. The deduction was authorized if the amounts were “interest” paid on “indebtedness” 1 within the meaning of § 203 (a) (8) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 169, 225. The Tax Court denied the deduction. 44 B. T. A. 293. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 137 F. 2d 623. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted because the decision below and Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Wilmington Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. John Kelley Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Frank Nelson, Jr. And Lee Etta Nelson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API