Legal Opinion

Growe v. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. (In Re Great Northern Paper, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine

Decided February 28, 2005No. 19-20038PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE

HORNBY, District Judge.

Bangor Hydro-Electric moves to withdraw reference of an adversary proceeding from the Bankruptcy Court, because the adversary proceeding may entail consideration of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC’s”) authority over hydro-electric dam benefits. The statute requires that such a motion be “timely.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). I conclude that the motion here is not timely and therefore DENY it.

The statute provides: “The district court shall, on timely motion of a party, .. withdraw a proceeding if the court determines that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Texaco Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Boyajian v. DeFusco (In Re Giorgio)District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Matter of Lissner Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. Lifemark Hospital of Louisiana, Inc. v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
  5. Laine v. GrossDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re: PAUL PHILLIP BARDOS, DBA Cadmus Construction Co.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API