Growe v. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. (In Re Great Northern Paper, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE
HORNBY, District Judge.
Bangor Hydro-Electric moves to withdraw reference of an adversary proceeding from the Bankruptcy Court, because the adversary proceeding may entail consideration of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC’s”) authority over hydro-electric dam benefits. The statute requires that such a motion be “timely.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). I conclude that the motion here is not timely and therefore DENY it.
The statute provides: “The district court shall, on timely motion of a party, .. withdraw a proceeding if the court determines that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Texaco Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Boyajian v. DeFusco (In Re Giorgio)District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
- Matter of Lissner Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Lifemark Hospital of Louisiana, Inc. v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Laine v. GrossDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: PAUL PHILLIP BARDOS, DBA Cadmus Construction Co.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016