Legal Opinion

Martin v. Signal Dodge, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1969No. 33366PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Commissioner.

Signal Dodge, Inc., a Delaware corporation, filed an intervening petition in a garnishment proceeding. The garnishment was requested by plaintiff Robert Martin in aid of an execution which in turn had been issued to collect a judgment against Signal Dodge, Inc. From an adverse judgment finding that intervenor and the judgment-debtor are the same corporate entity and dismissing the intervening petition, intervenor has appealed.

This proceeding had its genesis in a judgment obtained by Martin against Signal Dodge, Inc., in the sum of $6,212.17 on March 12, 1968. The petition…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Crowley v. CrowleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Orona v. Consolidated Cab CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. L. C. R. Excavating Contractors, Inc. v. W. S. Happel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aman Collection Service, Inc. v. BurgessMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Watson v. E.W. Bliss Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Moxness v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Ahlgren v. Colvin-Weber Realty & Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. BMO Harris Bank v. Hawes Trust Investments, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API