State v. Finkelstein
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
The trial court in this case granted a motion to dismiss Count 1 of the indictment, which alleged criminal damage to property without the owner’s consent. When the state refused to proceed on Count 2 the trial court granted a motion to dismiss the indictment. The state appeals both rulings.
1. The state contends that the trial court had no authority to dismiss Count 1 because the case was not settled between the prosecutor and the defendant with the consent of the court, and under the provisions of OCGA § 17-8-2 all indictments that are not settled must be submitted to the jury.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TuzmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Simpkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Schuman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- State v. SchumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.