Legal Opinion

State v. Finkelstein

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1984No. 67635PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

The trial court in this case granted a motion to dismiss Count 1 of the indictment, which alleged criminal damage to property without the owner’s consent. When the state refused to proceed on Count 2 the trial court granted a motion to dismiss the indictment. The state appeals both rulings.

1. The state contends that the trial court had no authority to dismiss Count 1 because the case was not settled between the prosecutor and the defendant with the consent of the court, and under the provisions of OCGA § 17-8-2 all indictments that are not settled must be submitted to the jury.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TuzmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Simpkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Schuman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. State v. SchumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API