Legal Opinion

Medley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 3, 1993No. CR 92-1267PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael Monroe Medley, the appellant, was convicted of driving under the influence, was fined $1000, and was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment. He raises four issues on this direct appeal from that conviction.

I

The appellant contends that the Uniform Traffic Ticket and Complaint (UTTC) did not sufficiently inform him of the offense with which he was charged. The UTTC charged the appellant with a violation of the "State Code T 32 . . . Section 5A-191A1A2." C.R. 1. In the "description of offense" portion of the UTTC, the block next to the statement "There Was .10% or More By Weight of Alcohol…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BettertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Ex Parte City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Ex Parte BucknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Frazier v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Beals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abernathey v. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. PattersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. State v. NaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. Jacobs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Bexley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API