Medley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Michael Monroe Medley, the appellant, was convicted of driving under the influence, was fined $1000, and was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment. He raises four issues on this direct appeal from that conviction.
I
The appellant contends that the Uniform Traffic Ticket and Complaint (UTTC) did not sufficiently inform him of the offense with which he was charged. The UTTC charged the appellant with a violation of the "State Code T 32 . . . Section 5A-191A1A2." C.R. 1. In the "description of offense" portion of the UTTC, the block next to the statement "There Was .10% or More By Weight of Alcohol…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte BettertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ex Parte City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Ex Parte BucknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Frazier v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Beals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Abernathey v. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PattersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- State v. NaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Jacobs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bexley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.