Legal Opinion

Brager v. Bigham

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 5, 1915PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court- of Baltimore City. (Bond, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

The appellees are leasehold owners of the property known as No. 233 North Eutaw street in Baltimore City. The property is subject to an irredeemable annual ground rent of twelve dollars. On January 24th, 1888, John Plummer Big-ham and others, the leasehold owners, leased the property to Joseph Sigmund. The lease recited that:

“The said parties of the first and second part do hereby lease unto the said Joseph Sigmund the three-story building, Number 233 N. Eutaw street, near Saratoga street, in the city aforesaid, said building fronting about 22 feet on the east side of Eutaw street, for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. GorterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  2. Swan v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Maryland Theatrical Corp. v. Manayunk Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Van Meter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Marburg v. Mercantile Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. State v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API