Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davis v. Citizens Insurance Co. of America

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1992No. Docket 130815, 133019Published

1ConcurrenceGriffin, J.

I concur in the judgment. I write separately to emphasize the limited scope of our affirmance.

The other no-fault jurisdictions that have considered the issue whether a specially equipped van is a reasonably necessary medical expense under their no-fault acts have done so with mixed results. In Stewart v Allstate Ins Co, 103 NJ 139; 510 A2d 1131 (1986), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the cost of a specially modified van is a medical expense covered by the personal injury protection provisions of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act. However, the Superior Court of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. MacDonald v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Thompson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API