Davis v. Citizens Insurance Co. of America
Michigan Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceGriffin, J.
I concur in the judgment. I write separately to emphasize the limited scope of our affirmance.
The other no-fault jurisdictions that have considered the issue whether a specially equipped van is a reasonably necessary medical expense under their no-fault acts have done so with mixed results. In Stewart v Allstate Ins Co, 103 NJ 139; 510 A2d 1131 (1986), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the cost of a specially modified van is a medical expense covered by the personal injury protection provisions of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act. However, the Superior Court of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- MacDonald v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Thompson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.