Legal Opinion

Ruth Norton v. Len Blaylock and Russell Cooper, Charlene Hudson, J. E. Hudson, Finis Hudson, Gene Smith, Wardon Davis and Troy Fowler

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1969No. 19375_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the order of the district court dismissing appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim entitling her to relief under the Constitution or laws of the United States.

The salient facts revealed by the complaint and attached exhibits are disclosed in the district court’s opinion reported at 285 F.Supp. 659 (W.D.Ark. 1968). Appellant does not dispute the accuracy of the court’s recital of the relevant events giving rise to this litigation. Neither is there any claim that the record before the district court does not disclose all pertinent facts and circumstances.

Prior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wilson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Marino v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Division 1287, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. Nunnery v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  5. Gooley v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API