Middleton v. Margulis
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentM. Warshawsky, J.
I must respectfully dissent from the majority.
I adopt the facts as they are clearly and concisely set forth in the majority’s opinion.
MCR 2.313(B) provides a variety of remedies for a party’s failure to respond to discovery orders or permit discovery. This Court has previously stated that the above provision is broad enough to permit a trial court to exclude evidence if the trial court, in its discretion, believes that such action is an appropriate remedy for violation of discovery practice. Kurczewski v State Highway Comm, 112 Mich App 544, 549; 316 NW2d 484 (1982), lv den 414 Mich 957…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kurczewski v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Banaszewski v. ColmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Thorne v. CarterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986