N.E. & R. Partnership v. Stone
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
The question presented is whether an action in behalf of a limited partnership may be brought in the name of a partnership which is the general partner without naming the general partners of the latter partnership. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ petition for failure to name the general partners.
Missouri follows the common law or aggregate theory of partnership under which, absent statutory authority, a partnership cannot sue in its name and all partners are necessary parties-plaintiff in actions to enforce an obligation due the partnership. Allgeier, Martin and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- McCormick v. RomansSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Huff v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Schwartz v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Riverside-Quindaro Bend Levee District v. Missouri American Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Sarasohn & Co. v. Prestige Hotels Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Fusco v. Rocky Mountain I Investments Limited PartnershipMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- City of Richmond Heights v. WaiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.