Legal Opinion

Harris v. Zier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1906No. 6217PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered January 19, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits, before the court without a jury, in an action against a retiring partner, on partnership liabilities.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a large number of claims assigned to him by the creditors of a copartnership known as Rissler & Zier. Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendants Kissler & Zier for the full amount claimed. The defendant Zier prosecutes this appeal.

*574The facts are these,: The defendants Conrad Kissler and George Zier were copartners doing a general merchandise business at Odessa, Washington, under tbe firm name of Kissler & Zier. In tbe month of March, 1902, tbe partnership became financially embarrassed. It was unable to meet…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry v. Murphy & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Goldenbergh v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lepic Ex Rel. Lepic v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. Pietz v. IndermuehleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Pietz v. IndermuehleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Brownwood Mut. Life Ins. Ass'n v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Brownwood Mut. Life Ins. Ass'n v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API