Legal Opinion

United States v. Ervin Herman Flowers

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1990No. 89-5820PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

The issue before us is whether appellant Flowers, a passenger on a Greyhound bus, was unlawfully seized when two narcotics officers entered the bus during a routine rest stop and initiated conversation with him. The district court, 724 F.Supp. 1206, held that Flowers was not seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment since a reasonable person would have believed that he was free to decline to answer question or to leave the bus. See United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 1877, 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980). We affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth Wayne BeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Albert WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Dennis S. Lewis. United States of America v. Leigha T. CothranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Kenneth BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  5. Stanberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API