Legal Opinion
Raner v. The Fun Pimps Entertainment LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 10, 2024No. 3:22-cv-05718Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 AT TACOMA 3 RYAN RANER, Case No. 3:22-cv-05718-TMC 4 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 5 v. FIRST MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 6 THE FUN PIMPS ENTERTAINMENT LLC; 7 RICHARD HUENINK; JOEL HUENINK, 8 Defendant. 9 Before the Court is Defendants The Fun Pimps Entertainment LLC, Richard Huenink, 10 and Joel Huenink’s first motion for summary judgment.1 Dkt. 107. For the following reasons, the 11 motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 12 I. BACKGROUND 13 Plaintiff Ryan Raner is a video game…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.