Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Park v. American Casualty Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1996No. Docket 171787, 179930Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCorrigan, J.

I concur that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside the default judgment. Defense counsel provided no reasonable excuse for failing to appear on the scheduled trial date; counsel should have ascertained the trial date from the transferred file. Contrary to Judge Schmucker’s dissent, the default was not an unwarranted sanction because defense counsel also missed the earlier scheduling conference, although he had an order with that pertinent date.

Nonetheless, this Court should set aside the arbitration award. The issue regarding arbitration, one not addressed so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cain v Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bak v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Schweighart v. Standard Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API