Legal Opinion
Fancher v. Fancher
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1909No. Sac. No. 1516PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are- stated in the opinion of the court. Ben Berry, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This cause was formerly heard and decided in Department. A rehearing having been granted and the cause having been heard by the court in Bank, the Department opinion is hereby reaffirmed and adopted. That opinion is as follows:—
“The complaint charged that the executors, as trustees of a fund under the will of the deceased, purposed to make an improper use of the fund, and prayed the court to restrain them from so doing and to direct the proper distribution of the moneys of the trust. The controversy grew out of the following undisputed facts: George Hicks Fancher died testate, leaving an…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bruggemeyer v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- In Re Estate of BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Lawrence v. ProsserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Estate of SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. BenedictSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.