Collier v. John Mendis, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
There is before the Court defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s claim was assigned by operation of law to his employer once he failed to file suit within six months of receiving compensation payments, under 33 U.S.C. § 933(b). Defendant alleges only that plaintiff filed the relevant forms and received payment, but nonetheless maintains that this constitutes an award under the statute. The legislative history, however, is clear that Congress did not contemplate that mere acceptance of funds is sufficient to trigger an assignment.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Caldwell v. Ogden Sea Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Dunbar v. Retla Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Sea Quest Marine, Inc. v. Cove Shipping, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carey v. Crane Service Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fearson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- O'CONNELL v. Maryland Steel Erectors, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Keller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
- Passman v. Companhia De Navegacao Maritima NetumarDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.