O'SULLIVAN v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
A
The plaintiffs in this Title VII action- — • Diane O’Sullivan, Nancy Lipman, and Janice Roche — are all veteran police officers with the Chicago Police Department. They alleged that the Department discriminated against them based on their race and retaliated against them once they complained about it. After a two-week trial, the jury found for the City of Chicago on the racial discrimination counts and for the plaintiffs on their retaliation claims.
The jury was…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flowers v. OwensDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- O'SULLIVAN v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- O'SULLIVAN v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Cobige v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.