Legal Opinion

Mandell Bros. v. Fogg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Contract for 1691.02 for goods sold and delivered according to an account annexed. Writ dated November 2, 1900. At the trial in the Superior Court Sheldon, J. ordered a verdict for the defendant on the ground stated in the opinion; and the plaintiff alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action brought in Massachusetts by an Illinois .corporation to recover from a wife the price of goods sold to her husband. The husband was a citizen of Massachusetts, and both the husband and the wife were temporarily in Chicago, when the husband bought the goods of the plaintiff. At the trial “ the plaintiff conceded that there was no evidence of a contract liability on the part of the defendant, . . . but . . . claimed the right to recover in this suit by virtue of ” the following statute of Illinois, which was put in evidence: “ The expenses of the family and of the education of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
  2. Isaacson v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Mandel Bros. v. SimpsonNew York County Court, Otsego County · 1910
  4. Meier & Frank Co. v. BruceIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Weathered Misses Shop, Inc. v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API