Legal Opinion

Meyer, Weiss & Co. v. Morgan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of WiUcinson County. Hon J. M. Smiley, Judge. All the important facts in this case will be found in the opinion of the court. It is assigned for error that the court refused to grant a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtSimrall, J.

Morgan claims damages from Meyer, Weiss & Co., for the sale of his cotton on a low market, when they were under instructions to hold for an advance, which advance took place shortly after the sale. ' Such is the cause of action counted upon.

Meyer, Weiss & Co. were cotton factors and commission merchants in New. Orleans, to whom Morgan, from time to time, made consignments of cotton for sale. It seems to be agreed by both parties, when the first shipment of seven bales was made, Morgan gave instructions that the cotton should be held until it could be sold for 18 cents per pound net. Other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richmond Manuf'g Co. v. StarksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1826
  2. Bacon v. VentressMississippi Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Comer & Co. v. Way & EdmundsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Chafin v. Main Island Creek Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Adams v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Cotton v. HillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API