Crain Bros. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
This suit is an aftermath of the litigation in this court at Nos. 217 and 218 in Admiralty, affirmed by the Court of Appeals, Pittsburgh Consol. Coal Co. v. Harrison Const. Co., 3 Cir., 223 F.2d 260. The issue in this case is whether libellant has coverage under a policy of insurance issued by respondent. There is no factual dispute except for the issue as to whether libellant gave respondent timely notice as is required under the insurance policy. All other facts have *664been stipulated. On the issue of timely notice, in paragraph 10, the court makes its own findings:
Find…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Skelly v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Hillman Transportation Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Bronx Towing Line, Inc. v. Continental Ins.District Court, E.D. New York · 1952
- Foss Launch & Tug Co. v. The KukuiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Upper Columbia River Towing Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1959
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Aetna InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966