City of Cincinnati v. Dawson

This appeal arises from an action for a declaratory judgment brought by the city of Cincinnati ■against its then director of finance, James G-. Flick, and' his successor, Frank A. Dawson, to determine whether Flick and Dawson improperly declined to process certain Cincinnati ordinances authorizing $34,100,000 of unvoted general obligation bonds issued for various purposes, including waterworks, public buildings, equipment, and hospital improvements. It is agreed that the additional millage required to service these couneilmanic bonds would, when added to millage required to service existing…