Legal Opinion
Midland Export, Ltd. v. Elkem Holding, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 18, 1996No. Civil Action 96-4506PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Midland Export, Ltd. (“Midland”) instituted this action under the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914,15 U.S.C. § 12 et seq. (1990 & Supp.1996), seeking treble damages and injunctive relief for two alleged violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890,15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (1990 & Supp.1996). Midland also asserts several pendent state law claims. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because Midland lacks the standing necessary to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Companhia Brasileira Carbureto De Calcio-CBBCC v. Applied Industrial Materials Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- HAYNES v. LEACHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022