Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. American Oil Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1975No. 59881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leighton

This litigation was begun by a truck driver who sued two oil companies for personal injuries he sustained at an oil refinery owned by one of them. The case was heard by a jury that returned a verdict in favor of the truck driver. After hearing a post-trial motion, the court ordered that judgment notwithstanding tire verdict be entered in favor of the oil company which was then the only defendant in the case. Alternatively and conditionally, it denied the company’s motion for a new trial. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Weiner v. TrasattiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Neubauer v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stanley W. Jakubiec v. Cities Service Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Edward J. Meyers Company, a Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Newton v. MeissnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Kern v. Uregas Service of West Frankfort, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Solar Equity Corporation, Defendant-Counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Yedor v. Centre Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API