Legal Opinion
Bautista v. Juul Labs, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 12, 2020No. 4:20-cv-01613Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIA DE LA LUZ PEREZ BAUTISTA, Case No. 20-cv-01613-HSG et al., 8 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO Plaintiffs, COMPEL ARBITRATION 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 37 10 JUUL LABS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are motions to compel arbitration and stay the proceedings filed 14 by Defendants Long Ying International, Inc. (“LYI”), David M. Ho, Juul Labs, Inc. (“Juul”), and 15 the Coalition for Reasonable Vaping Regulation (“CRVR”). Dkt. Nos. 34 (“LYI Mot.”); 37 (“Juul 16 Mot.”). Briefing on the motions is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.