Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Department of Agriculture v. McCarthy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

From the petition and the return and the records filed in this court, a regrettable state of affairs is disclosed. It appears that the action in which the Quaker Dairy Company is defendant was set for trial on April 19, 1941. Prior to' the date of trial the defendant dismissed its attorneys and retained Mark Catlin, Jr., an attorney at law then .serving as assemblyman at the regular session of the 1941 legislature. Mr. Catlin appeared as attorney for the defendant and in the exercise of the right conferred upon him by sec. 256.13, Stats., demanded an adjournment of the trial pending the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dimond v. HendersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodland v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. MallettWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. MallettWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API