Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Sonneland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1972No. 42076Published

1DissentHale, J.

(dissenting) — On motion of the defendant and over the state’s vigorous objection, the court dismissed the information. The sole reason given for the dismissal was that the “furtherance of justice would be served by the granting of defendant’s motion herein.” Defendant’s motion to dismiss was based

upon the ground that said defendant entered into an agreement with the Prosecuting Attorney of Cowlitz County, Washington, whereby all charges pending herein would be dismissed upon the completion of certain acts by the defendant; that the defendant’s duties and obligations under said agreement have…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. RandeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API