Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Campagna v. Arleo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2006Published

1Concurrence

Fisher, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to modify the order appealed from by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the cross motion; as so modified, votes to affirm, with the following memorandum, in which Florio, J.E, concurs:

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for summary judgment on the issue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Ayotte v. GervasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Williams v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Keyes v. City of AlbanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1984
  5. Morgan v. Prospect Park Associates Holdings, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API