Legal Opinion

Hackleman v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1837PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of debt commenced in October, 1834, before a justice of the peace. The defence relied on was a certain matter of set-off. The justice gave judgment for the defendants.

In the Circuit Court, the parties filed the following agreed case, on which the defendants obtained a judgment:—

“ James Hackleman, administrator, v. Abraham Boys and Samuel Miller. The plaintiff being at the time administrator of the estate of Joseph Moffitt, deceased, sold at public auction agreeably to law, in the administration of the estate, goods and chattels which he had inventoried, to Miller one of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Townsley v. SumrallSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. Cincinnati Steam Heating Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Holderbaugh v. TurpinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Spooner v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Wilson v. HentgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. People v. FrostNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API